False Alibi Cases - Timing, Receipts, and Scandal: The Science of What Juries Believe

Failed to add items

Sorry, we are unable to add the item because your shopping cart is already at capacity.

Add to basket failed.

Please try again later

Add to wishlist failed.

Please try again later

Remove from wishlist failed.

Please try again later

Adding to library failed

Please try again

Follow podcast failed

Unfollow podcast failed

False Alibi Cases - Timing, Receipts, and Scandal: The Science of What Juries Believe

Listen for free

View show details

About this listen

Alexandra Reeves examines the psychology of alibi believability in court, revealing how juries evaluate claims of "I wasn't there." Research shows moral character, physical evidence like receipts, and disclosure timing dramatically affect verdicts—often more than truth itself. Discover why innocent defendants with solid alibis still lose.

Loved this episode? Discover more original shows from the Quiet Please Network at QuietPlease.ai, explore our curated favorites here amzn.to/42YoQGI, and catch just a slice of our AI hosts in action on Instagram at instagram.com/claredelish and YouTube at youtube.com/@DIYHOMEGARDENTV

This content was created in partnership and with the help of Artificial Intelligence AI

No reviews yet